tdierikx

This link is what I got for the article when I looked it up on the 9News website... https://www.9news.com.au/national/brisbane-dangerous-dog-council-orders-staffy-that-killed-two-pet-cars-in-sherwood-be-euthanased/155029bc-03eb-4e2f-96e7-c081ffc8321f T.

A Parvac on entry for all dogs may have saved some of the other dogs from this fate, depending on how long they'd been there before the sick dog arrived. Parvac vaccine costs around $20 per dose. T.

No... just no... T.

Not really, as there could be other conditions that may create low testosterone or estrogen levels. T.

May I suggest AMRRIC? They do amazing work in remote areas and get no government funding... https://www.amrric.org/ T.

I agree that a dye in a surgical incision may work, but until that is suggested and then enacted across the board, an ultrasound is the least intrusive way to tell, yes? Opening up a dog and finding the surgery has already been done is much more stressful on a dog's system, and will also attract a surgical fee and post op care/meds fees. Not to mention those where shaving is needed to find a dyed scar, generally a dog is sedated/anaesthetised for surgery before the shaving is done, so will attract fees for that too. For a male that may have undescended testicles, those will show on an xray also. T.

Just worth noting that we see multiple news reports of this sort just before some level of government are looking to enact even stricter animal keeping legislation. The last time we saw a rise in dog attack news reports was just before the Queensland state government pushed through their new laws which included banning a number of dog breeds (and their crosses)... just sayin'... Other states are looking at doing similar to Queensland's new legislation... and media reporting certainly has the effect of engendering public support for such changes. Unfortunately, while we are all for stronger laws regarding who is responsible for dog attacks and the harshness of the penalties, the legislation also tends to go further than just addressing the actual issue of dog attacks - as with the Qld banning of certain breeds and their crosses, there is no actual guideline as to what constitutes the defining characteristics of breed/crosses, so a vague visual of a tan bull breed type dog can be labelled a pitbull without actually needing to prove the actual breed type, and a declaration can be made after such a vague visual observation regardless whether the dog in question has shown any aggressive behaviours or not. T.

Generally, a person that goes to the effort of getting tubal ligations or vasectomies on their dogs has also gone to the effort of microchipping and registering them, yes? And so any rescue that might end up with one of those dogs would have the info that they are desexed from either of those 2 identification methods, wouldn't you think? It would be a VERY rare occasion that it was completely unknown that a dog had had either procedure when they entered the rescue realm. T.

Jeebus! The dog ripped her arm off from below the elbow... that's a bit more than "riled up"... T.

My current foster dog has 2 microchips, as AWL didn't find the original one when they first scanned her... that one is near her right elbow and seems to be faulty and hard to get a reading from, but it is there if she is scanned all over. So both chips have apparently been linked in the NSW registry, but she will now come to her new owner with 2 change of owner forms so that both chip entries will need to be updated when she is rehomed. In NSW, Victoria and a couple other states cats ARE required to be microchipped, and have been for quite some years. The problem is that it is almost impossible to enforce it. The only way that it could be enforced is for the authorities to doorknock everyone and demand to scan all pets on the property... and do we think that we want that to happen? That said, I think one council area in Queensland was proposing to do exactly that... and I don't think it went down well. Possibly it was scrapped due to residents loudly rejecting the proposal, as I haven't heard any news on it actually happening. Tattoos are all well and good on an ear that is relatively hair free and pale skinned, but are hard to find on animals with hairy ears or dark skin colours. Tattoos can also fade over time, so an older cat's tattoo may not necessarily be easy to find either. With cats, being desexed and microchipped still doesn't make them immune from killing wildlife, or falling victim to urban life (cars, dogs, nasty people, illness/injury, etc)... so it's also best to keep them contained to their owners' properties, yes? Also, a desexed cat might not necessarily be "owned" by anyone... TNR programs done on street cat colonies confuses that assumption. As for rescues not knowing whether an animal is desexed or not, a simple ultrasound will suffice to confirm the existence of reproductive organs. I don't think too may rescue animals have had tubal ligations or vasectomies... T.

OK... two months and one previous event does not constitute a "long history"... Assessing a reactive dog while wearing bite suits would be somewhat overwhelming for a dog with reactive issues, wouldn't one think? The fact that the owner did not comply with the dangerous dog order by not having it muzzled or wearing the dangerous dog collar, and letting go of the lead in a public place, shows the level of compliance she was willing to go to (or not)... so definitely her fault in the case of the bite to the human victim. In the end, it's the dog who has paid the price for it's owner's complacency... IMHO, she should also be held accountable is some way other than just losing her dog. T.

Most vet waiting rooms have at least one person that will allow their dog(s) to run up to other dogs without a care... which is annoying to say the least, and even moreso when you have a reactive dog. The first time I had to take Alice to the vet was when she had an upset tummy just a few days after I got her, vomiting and generally not a happy girl - we had to go to a vet clinic out of area as it was a Sunday afternoon, but they were really good once it became apparent that Alice wasn't comfortable around the other dogs there. We were ushered into a spare consult room to wait so that she didn't get any more stressed than she already was. My last personal dog was Harper, who was not dog or stranger friendly at all - fear based, but would want to fight other dogs, and we'd muzzle her for the checkup by the vet just in case. When I made vet appointments for her, we'd generally make them for a time that no other dogs would be there (usually just before the middle of the day surgeries), and we'd wait in the car until it was our turn to go in. Most vets will accommodate you if you are clear and upfront about your dog's issues when making an appointment. The hardest part of having a foster dog with anxiety issues is finding the right home for them. Dogs like Alice will possibly never get over their stress issues about other dogs, and should never be complacently put in situations where they can act on their stresses. Most people wanting to adopt a rescue dog are looking for a companion that they can take out for walks or to public places, or even have friends dogs come visit... and that kind of home will definitely not be a suitable home for a dog like Alice who just prefers the company of humans. I reckon her best option is someone who is a bit of a home body, or who works from home, and will be perfectly happy just having a little tank of a lovebug dog hanging out with them. Alice has so much love to give, and is a great little dog in every respect bar the anxiety about other dogs issue... you really couldn't meet a friendlier and more sweet natured girl. T.

Yes, they still have horse riding paths... and every now and then there is a news story about offlead dogs harassing the horses... The thing about unfenced dog parks is that dog owners shouldn't wait until they are right at the boundary before leashing their dogs to leave... too much chance of a dog straying beyond the boundary and being where it shouldn't. T.

I bought a flirt pole for Alice... think the pole with the dangling toy used for cats, but make it bigger and tougher for dogs... and she loves it! We can play with her chasing that for a good 10 minutes and then she's exhausted and well exercised for the day. Some days we play fetch with a tennis ball, and her indication that she's done is by biting down and splitting the ball in half... lucky I have a bazillion tennis balls... lol! I use the term "fetch" lightly, as it's more of a "I have it, you chase me for it" scenario... exercise for the both of us... haha! When I do the poo patrol, I tell Alice to "find the poo" and her job is to lead me to where it might be... she's gotten really good at it too... Alice's fave treat is a piece of carrot, so when she bugs me for a treat I say "where is your carrot?" and she leads me to the fridge and sits in front of it waiting for her bit of carrot, which she then takes off to my bed to eat... lucky she leaves no mess. She also has a range of hard wearing chew toys that she knows she can chew at any time to satisfy that urge. She doesn't chew anything she's not supposed to. Alice loves all humans above anything else. She just doesn't deal well with the proximity of other dogs. She gets very vocal but doesn't show any actual aggression, just screams at them (not barking, actual screaming like staffies do). She is a vocal girl generally when she's not sure about anything, like when we were driving to our training session with a professional trainer yesterday, she "talked" the whole way there... That said, I don't think she would react well to an off-lead dog running up to her and challenging her... and I'm not inclined to find out. She is getting better at home when she hears dogs barking on the TV or when one of the neighbours' dogs starts barking, she tends to ignore those now, where she used to get quite upset about it when I first got her. She will watch dogs on the TV intently now, but not get upset about it. She gets lots of praise for staying calm too. If she's on my bed and looking out the window and someone walks their dog past, she will generally come to me and let me know that there is another dog outside, and I tell her that it's ok and give her a cuddle, and she's happy with that. Generally, leaving the comfort and safety of the house/yard is stressful for Alice, and I don't think that she'll ever truly get past that. We are trying all methods to get her a bit more comfortable with leaving her safe place, but I don't really see a time where she will be running happily in an off leash dog park with other dogs, it's just not in her make-up IMHO. If we can get her to a point where she's relatively calm when visiting the vet clinic, I reckon that will be a huge step forward. She's fine with the vets and nurses doing anything with her, so that's not the issue, just a point where she's not screaming at other dogs in the waiting room would be nice. T.

Another stupid design fault with the park was that the canal was open to access by the dogs... lost count of how many we fished out when they couldn't get up the sides themselves... *sigh* The cafe was awesome though... good food and great coffee... *grin* I used to take Trouble, Zeddy, and Connor down there regularly and they loved it. Their recall was excellent, and I never let them just run up to a strange dog willy-nilly. They preferred to hang around the cafe tables and give people the "my mum doesn't feed me" look until someone would give them a tidbit. Poor Connor being an intact male would occasionally be challenged by other intact male dogs, but he was such a sooky boy and never rose to the challenge, he would wait for me to make the other dog move on - not bad for a 47kg Rotti... T.