Jump to content

Are You Serious Jo

  • Posts

    7,656
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Are You Serious Jo

  1. The thing they forget is that if the complaints have no merit nothing would have happened to him, so he's basically admitting he has done things wrong and got caught. Joan of Mark was really laying it on, still a bunch of contradictions, one post it's all the orders were minor and it took only a days work to be compliant, now it's extensive effort on his part for compliance. I also love how he is supporting the legal team, dream on Mark :laugh:
  2. He's gone! It's still full of lies, but he now has limited opportunity to officially spread misinformation :thumbsup:
  3. I'd say some have pinged off because there wouldn't be much territory there and the dominant cats would already have it. I was thinking of how would they catch the ones who are living a bit further out but it's a stupid through really because I doubt they even care.
  4. I can't even think of the right term for it, it's like he has to confess but leaves his name and implies it's his critics doing the behaviours. Quite bizarre as his posts exactly mirror his behaviour. As for the cats, I don't even know how some of them will be caught if they live on the outskirts of the shelter and are semi wild.
  5. Was told for aggression, but there is a new baby so I don't know if it's a case of dog being thrown outside (escaped and they got a fine) or it's genuine. At least an undesexed dog that is possibly aggressive isn't being given away to anyone.
  6. Owner decided to PTS and won't be changing their mind even though I assured the dog would be PTS if found to be aggressive.
  7. I think part of his disorder is to accuse those who question him of the exact thing he is doing, it's like he says to himself I am currently telling a lie, must go post that they are lying, it's basically an exact match to his behaviour! "Then it became all about lies, deceit and misinformation, even intimidation, threats and all sorts of horrors..." Would love to know why he will be in the courts for a while to come, if people are ending up in courts it's because of their own behaviour.
  8. I'd guess that confiscated money would go back to the people who donated if they were records, but am just guessing.
  9. Funny how the truth isn't anywhere near as rosy as Mark's vaguebooking.
  10. I was sure he said they had taken to the vet, from his official website http://www.markmaldridge.com/MOOROOK-V-RSPCA-update.html I have the screenshot but will just copy the text for now. "They also entered the cat enclosures with the same disrespect in relation to safety and quarantine protection, they earmarked this time 2 cats to themselves, but video surveillance showed this, and immediately both cats were taken to the local vet and were back within 1 hours passing health checks, at no stage did the RSPCA bring these concerns to anyone at the shelter, if not for video surveillance, if the animals did have health issues, they could have spread to others in the populations, luckily the RSPCA’s Independent vet, was wrong in her assessment."
  11. Ena drank the Kool-aid, she has changed her tune, I knew her in person. Now I'd like to know who has done the "independent assessment", again, vague details. I'd also like to know how every semi-feral cat was caught and taken to the vet for their full health checks. How did they manage to catch them all since they are fairly wild.
  12. Does anyone know if there is a Boxer rescue in SA? I've checked the doesn't seem to be any here. Female boxer, undesexed, that is all I know so far, so would really like to see this dog go to breed rescue.
  13. I hope so, but their idea of what is acceptable varies wildly with ours so I don't think much will be done differently. I just want it over so no more animals are put through that.
  14. I know there is one volunteer going in regularly, but I don't know how many. Lola still takes trips down to Adelaide so she isn't there those days. I became really worried for the animals once those security gates went up. I know that the rscpa will just go through them but now the animals are behind there with only Lola and whatever volunteers and Lola seems to think she is safe behind there and no one is coming in. When she was left to her own devices before the place was far worse and I hope that isn't happening now.
  15. He has to get through the nomination process before some freak occurrence can happen and given his recent behaviour that is looking shaky. Though I would get a great deal of satisfaction from watching him get grilled and shown up by the experienced pollies, he can't defame and ban them in parliament. I suspect he really doesn't want to be elected as he knows he's have to face grown men who won't be bullied into submission.
  16. Well catsndogs, since he can nominate himself I think your question has been answered :laugh:
  17. Good Lord, not if you were literally the last man on Earth Mark. What does his delusional wife think happens in politics? If he was considered a serious contender for a federal seat he'd have a hell of a lot more happen than people look through the last few years of his public FB pages. I already suspect that there is some arrangement between Moorook and Mark, there was actually some material on the website where Mark was receiving a certain percent of fundraising on something, so it's not something that is fiction. I can understand not handing over work I had done to a friend of Mark's as he already had a financial arrangement with Moorook and it would only get worse if his friend was web admin. Having said that nothing stopping Moorook setting up their own website as they appear to be doing.
  18. I think it is wonderful that he has been nominated for that medal, these are some of the categories: Pride of Australia Medal: Class/Category: Numpty Division: Sub Section: Great Australian Tuggers :rofl: Let me guess, Cinch Marshall, Fair Go and Geoff Sharpe nominated him :laugh:
  19. Reading it now, has been a while since I've been so proud of people I've never met :thumbsup:
  20. He's basically throwing the volunteers under a bus because he knows that Lola is going to be in trouble despite his claims she isn't. Of course we all know that the owner of a business is entirely responsible for what happens in her business and a judge won't give a damn who he tries to pass the blame to. Ignorance is no defence in the eyes of the law, but he's giving it a red hot go.
×
×
  • Create New...