Jump to content

Micro-chipping Prior To Dogs Victoria Registration Be Compulsory Acros


SwaY
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have just looked at my litter reg form and 1 sticker takes up 2 lines in depth and goes half way across into the limited reg column....I think if they want each puppy to have a sticker then they need to re-design the form.

That is true but unless you have a really large litter there is enough room to use every second line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just looked at my litter reg form and 1 sticker takes up 2 lines in depth and goes half way across into the limited reg column....I think if they want each puppy to have a sticker then they need to re-design the form.

That is true but unless you have a really large litter there is enough room to use every second line.

All we can do is try it BB. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just looked at my litter reg form and 1 sticker takes up 2 lines in depth and goes half way across into the limited reg column....I think if they want each puppy to have a sticker then they need to re-design the form.

That is true but unless you have a really large litter there is enough room to use every second line.

I had a litter of 8 last year, I managed to fit the stickers on line after line.

I overlapped them on the sticker above.

I do think they need to re-do the form thou.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can fit the microchip numbers on the form. Trim the top and bottom of the sticker and it will fit in the allocated spot. I have even had the VCA office give me scissors when lodging a litter regsitration form personally so that I could trim them to make them fit on the form, so I know they will accept the numbers that way.

I agree a modified form would be better but I would only see that happpening once all the other forms are used up. How many have they got I don't know but as mentioned we now have 30 letters in total to work with and that has been two years plus now.

I am all for microchipping, I have been doing it for many years now and am happy to see it become compulsory for canine council registration. To me it is another way to varify a pedigree so that it matches the puppy. I am all for DNA for proof of parentage as well.

IMO, Sadly the credibility of the honour system went out the door a long time ago as some people's ethics dropped and the almighty dollar corrupted these types of people. We see it time and time again that a pedigree is questioned and sadly we are now seeing many puppies not being what they say the are on their pedigrees due to the ability to now have a parentage DNA test done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...