Little Gifts

I'm so sad - I only want my own rubbish in my bins. I realised I was 'bin selfish' when my neighbours started just putting their manky rubbish in my part full bin to save them dragging their own out. Once it was prawn shells and heads in my empty bin in summer as they'd missed the garbage truck with theirs. Another time it was loose food waste and other non-recyclable rubbish in my recycling bin - that's what tipped me over the edge. So I doubt I'd be ok about someone else's poo, especially if my bin was just emptied.

Strangely T we have a large dog park nearby and we rarely see a dog there (we go Sunday afternoons). It has a gate at both ends too so if someone were to turn up we would simply exit from the other end. All open so we can see people coming. It's part of Albert's desensitisation. He goes where other dogs have been (sniffing is his number 1 hobby) but has a positive experience. It took 3 visits of this nature for him to not be so tense even going there. Each time we go he indicates when he has had enough too and that is also getting longer. I'm always looking out for other dog parks less frequented now so we can try different spots. Maybe this video was a similar scenario? It was empty and they wanted their dog to have a run but now they can't leave because of a loose dog that the owner is not controlling? We also exercise Albert at home playing soccer and with those big balls people exercise with. We want to get him a stronger horse type one. We've got a big block and he has zoomies at least once a day which we get involved in. Might have to look into a flirt pole to try!

When I watched it the loose dog seemed to be running around and around the fenced dog park, meaning that when the couple tried to leave with their dog aggressive dog it might have run up to them and caused some chaos. The other guy was just letting his dog do whatever it wanted, didn't see a leash and didn't hear him attempt to give it any commands to come to his side. Basically it seemed like an avoidable scene just waiting to happen. And T, Albert is not aggressive either and doesn't accidentally turn on humans when he is fearful either. He basically starts screaming and barking to tell other dogs to back off and leave him alone. He is usually trying to get away from them while doing it. He has gotten a little better (we can get closer if they aren't coming towards him or looking at him) but his fear is sadly real. I suspect while he had entropian and couldn't see he lived in a lot of fear from the other dogs around him. His entire body was covered in little nip wounds when he came to us and he has a small chunk out of his ear and some patches where no hair grows on a leg and down his side from scar tissue. Poor bugger.

What bloody idiot! He doesn't look too steady on his feet and if something happened with his dog I doubt he'd be much use in getting there quickly or getting things under control on his own. Doesn't look like he even has a leash with him! We tried Albert out at a dog park today (pei event) to see where he was at with his fearfulness. As soon as the dogs behind the fence came over to say hello he got escalated. So we took him for a leashed walk instead. But had a loose even friendly dog come up to him he would've totally lost the plot. I would've been livid had I come across this selfish arsehole. His dogs needs are not more important than my own.

Wow. That's a very interesting development. Shame on that owner for not containing 4 large breed dogs that she knew to cause harm and intimidation. Shame on that council to not expedite matters after harm had already been caused. These 2 things are why dogs die and innocent people are hurt.

Even though they had attacked an elderly person the day before it doesn't say when council found out about it. It may not have been reported till the following day (date of second incident) and exact location of the dogs may not have yet been known. Otherwise dogs would have already been seized. Even the owners may not have been aware of it had they gotten home from work that night and their dogs were back in their yard. Horrible circumstances but I'm thinking council may not have dragged the chain on this, otherwise the article would have clearly thrown some blame their way.

Worst nightmare losing an animal and never knowing what happened to it. If only Roo could talk!

This is the part I don't like about them the most. They've made their policies work for them. I agree with T that the dogs are generally much better off with a smaller rescue (especially if breed specific) but honestly it is a bit like a huge hospital getting everyone to go a local doctor instead and claiming they have successfully triaged, treated and discharged x number of patients. And LMO, that would've been new having such a large doggo in the house!

The RSPCA is the voice in the article so it sounds like they have the ones done all that great work. But as we know, they are experts at spinning things....

So someone was adopted today - yes, after 6 months we have foster failed him! Happy Gotcha Day Albert!

I just got even madder - I've just seen independent rescue groups in Tassie are also taking on some of the dogs and the cost for veterinary and other work. RSPCA don't tell the public that though do they and they certainly wont be moving any funds over to these rescue groups to help them with the costs they will incur. So people will be donating for work the RSPCA will not even be doing.

They are missing an obvious one. An ethical breeder asks questions to determine which of their pups might be a good match for you and your family. A puppy farmer shows you pics of the pups and just asks which one you want, like you are buying a product off a shelf (that comes in different colours).

Makes my blood boil. Not only that this huge puppy farmer business took so long to be shut down (with no financial penalty) but because the RSPCA didn't have any clear plans on how to manage the incoming number of dogs within their own humungous organisation? Also they have their own vets who would be on a salary so why are they including potential vet costs as a reason to seek more money to do what they already get funded to do? Why don't they use the sales from all those pending adoptions to cover it? Instead of this being a good news story about dogs now free from being breeding machines they are using it to be lazy money grubbers, blaming the law that they couldn't do more. Zero respect for them as an organisation.

I do it, but only with dogs who indicate they are struggling to keep themselves warm. I don't think foster boy Albert had ever worn a coat before and to be honest he seems to have a thick enough coat, but he's quite unsettled when he is cold. He started with a single layer one, and currently a double layer one. It was 0 degrees with very high winds last week and he wore his coat solidly for 3 days. If I tried to remove it he growled at me! So I monitor the weather and him and respond accordingly!

What a fantastic idea! I've had one with CCD (passed just shy of 17) and one with Sundowners (passed at 15.5). Both were staffords and very engaged in life right until their time came. I never thought of starting new challenges with either and was all about just maintaining things at a comfortable level for them, so I'm keen to do things differently next time based on this.