Interesting tidbit found in Victorian council Domestic Animal Management Plan draft

[tdierikx]

As part of my involvement with Animal Care Australia, I regularly assist in our submissions relating to animal welfare policies and legislation Australia-wide.

 

Currently looking at the draft Domestic Animal Management Plan (DAMP) for Wellington Shire Council in Victoria - https://your.wellington.vic.gov.au/domestic-animal-management-plan-review - and came across this interesting tidbit...

 

 

Heads up to any of our breeder members here who might be targeted for council visits (or worse) if you live in that shire and advertise any of your pups on this site.

 

T.

[_PL_]

On 12/10/2025 at 9:30 PM, saxmaoks said:

Curious to find out how many dogs share your pet’s name, breed, or suburb?

Sure thing, you can have some personal information.
I'm curious to know your credit card number.  We'll swap.

[DonnaMariee]

On 30/08/2025 at 12:25 PM, tdierikx said:

As part of my involvement with Animal Care Australia, I regularly assist in our submissions relating to animal welfare policies and legislation Australia-wide.

 

Currently looking at the draft Domestic Animal Management Plan (DAMP) for Wellington Shire Council in Victoria - https://your.wellington.vic.gov.au/domestic-animal-management-plan-review - and came across this interesting tidbit...

 

 

Heads up to any of our breeder members here who might be targeted for council visits (or worse) if you live in that shire and advertise any of your pups on this site.

 

T.

Im hoping this will mean that we can "weed out" the very people who do so much damage to the Breeds by "Backyard Breeding" they are usually the ones who advertise on FB and MP as "Pure Bred" puppies but sell them cheaper "without papers" they have no interest in the Welfare of the dog it's all about the money, l have worked in Rescue for many years and constantly see the end result of pups that are sold on these websites only to go onto be "mothers" as soon as they go on heat.  If people breed responsibly then this could only be a good thing for all breeds and the Breeders who are Registered, Responsible and who do the right thing

[Dogsfevr]

This method has been used for years by councils but not well enough 

[asal]

Had an interesting conversation with a lady this weekend 

She had decided to get a bitch of her favourite breed to show and later breed.

Rejoined dogs NSW, sat the required breeders exam 12 months later to then after passing register her prefix.

Next she was inspected by the ANKC liaison officer to ensure she complied with the POCTA legislation for registered breeders.

To her amazement she learnt that her live in the house pet/show/ potential brood girl, had to not only have her designated 6 foot high kennel and run, as well a well seperated an isolation quarantine kennel area, signage with her vets name and contact number. Written fire and flood evacuation plan, fire extinguisher and number of employees of her "business"....

 

I do remember when I was inspected for POCTA compliance thinking " surely this is drafted that to pass, you ARE now a puppy farm.". The very monster's to be eliminated????

 

So I fully understand her shock and revulsion of the whole experience...

 

Screams now a witch hunt Target 

Surely

 

Not surprisingly she has decided wants no part of this scenario.

 

Her girl will be desexed after she has bred an unregistered litter to keep one for the future and desex and pet home those she won't keep.

 

. another lost to the breed and rapidly shrinking gene pool 

 

Exactly as PETA planned and boasted is on track in 2020....

 

 

Edited 23 hours ago by asal

[asal]

Somehow I doubt neither the manipulated politicians or Australian public will wake up before it's too late to save domestic dogs and cats from the extinction, the PETA spokesperson boasted in 2020 "is on track within this generation "

 

.

[moosmum]

Nor ANKC, whos members have played a huge part in this result in their attempts to fulfill the Objectives as set out in the whole of their written intention and constitution. 

The reason? Its not based on reality. Value is subjective. All of it. ANKC attached the value of a K9 to their Objective.

The Objective is value negative. Any value attached the objective can only be expressed in the negative.

In language, its created a double negative. The objective can't achieve definition, because you can't DEFINE it. Not when a 'good dog' or an 'improved' dog is defined by a pedigree standard.

They are not the same thing.

All this, from a faith based statement that refuses recognition of cross breed dogs to place the value of a dog into its pedigree.

I set out years ago to solve this riddle, and spent the last few on the science forums to test and fully understand it, back to its mathematical formulae, and did it. 

Its not what I thought I had. I doubt I will get anyone to believe it, but it works. In every instance to which its been applied. It has not been able to be falsified.

The duality of the Objective and subjective realities and the basic laws governing our use of mathematics, language, biology, science etc.

 

 

All 'states' are in decline. The only 'pure' state is nothing. If you can't define the objective state, but any purpose is subverted to its maintainance, it will only be achieved when you have nothing. Because anything that doesn't belong by definition must be eliminated. Anything not recognized to support the state AS recognized... must be a foreign state to be eliminated. Hence the organism dies, eventually, while its species continues to evolve. Self imposed eugenics.

 By by dogs!

 

 

 

Edited 6 hours ago by moosmum

[_PL_]

@moosmum that's very complicated and thought provoking, but I understand the basics. Thank you.  

[moosmum]

Yes, it is. But how it works is demonstrated by our use of mathematics to model reality and supported by all known laws of physics including biophysics and evolutionary science.

 

The foundations that domestic dogs were built on are being systematically eliminated. The supports that allow them. We discredit them from the equation. Disallowed. Because we can't recognize where the value actually lies. 

Use and understanding of known Pedigrees can lead to improved dog breeding, but they do NOT decide the value of a dog. Its 'validity'.

 

Edited 13 minutes ago by moosmum