tdierikx

I can't get over the growth spurt Zuri has had since Enzi was born... she's looking so much more mature than her tender years now. T.

He sounds like a completely normal cheeky 14 week old pup to me... lol! T.

No problems Paul777... glad to be of any assistance... T.

Ash is such ahandsome boy now, isn't he? But I still love "my" Pudden bestest... *blows kisses at the boofhead boy* T.

Wandering cats can cause car accidents when people swerve to try to avoid them... seen it happen more than once... I am allergic to cats, so can't have any of my own, but would never go out of my way to hurt one in any way... however, I have neighbours who think that their cats have the right to go wandering whenever and wherever they please. I must say that a cat going over 2 fences to go into my dog pen with 3 Rotties in it was not the smartest move a cat could make... and not only the owner was traumatised by the outcome... but responding by poisoning 2 of my dogs (one died as a result) was not exactly a civil course of action either. One place I lived at, the neighbour's cat had a penchant for dismembering birds on my front lawn. I had a polite word with said neighbour (who was horrified that her cat was doing it), and she would periodically come and remove the mess left by her cat... At my current residence, there used to be a tomcat that would come and mark my front door every night... not pleasant... so I invested in a very lifelike concrete black snake ornament - no more marking... even scared the poor parcel delivery person a couple of times... lol! Not a fan of cats deciding to make babies underneath my bedroom window in the wee hours either... jeebus they are noisy! And they set the dogs off to boot! T.

From the photos you've posted in another thread, Zagan looks like he's doing just fine... just keep feeling him over when he's going through his spurts and feed accordingly. If he's gained enough coverage in a couple of days, then ease back on too much extra, as we don't want to overdo it either... *grin* There's no formula as to how much to feed really... so the best way to judge is by feeling/looking and going by overall condition of each individual pup. You are doing great... T.

Can you see his hip bones when he's standing normally? If so, feed a bit more... if not, you are doing fine... *grin* Pups can go through spurts of not being able to fill them up one week, and then not wanting much at all for a while... it can be bloody frustrating... lol! My general rule is that as long as you can't actually see their hips and ribs sticking out when they are in a standard standing pose, then they should be fine... pups can carry a little extra weight, but you wouldn't want too much extra on a large breed growing pup - just to make sure he has the right start for his primary joints. T.

OMG... he's adorable! Hi Zagan! T.

Intranasal has a faster take-up than the injection version by a couple of days... but if your breeder advises the injection, I'd be going with that. Both cover the same 2 strains and last for the same length of time (approximately 6 months). T.

Mary wears lippie... lol! T.

I'm not attacking anybody... just voicing an opinion that might differ from theirs or yours is all. I don't make any decisions for other rescues other than to choose to donate my time or resources... or not... We all know that there are people in rescue that really shouldn't be... for a myriad reasons... not least of which, when things go pear shaped, those types that manage to give rescue in general a bad name. And as for questionable practices... you were there and can verify if the rumours were/are true, can you? Because that's all it was... rumours... I should know, I WAS actually there. But it's so much more fun to keep rumours circulating without any proof, and bringing them up years later to try to score some sort of "moral victory" when someone doesn't necessarily agree with your point of view, isn't it? Beats me... T.

You're free to do whatever you like, I just think it's unfair (or perhaps even dishonest) to tear down other groups with very vague statements, while ignoring or purposely not mentioning that some of your own decisions could be considered as bad, if not worse. I'm all for open discussion, as long as it's actually open, and not just open where it suits certain people. Let's get something straight here... the rescue I was with (that you are obviously referring to) closed down around 4 years ago, and I did not run it, nor make the decisions as to how it ran. I was a volunteer and foster carer is all. We took in our fair share of special needs (read abuse and neglect) cases over the years also, but people seem to conveniently "forget" that part of our rescue's work. Most had a good outcome, but some didn't, and hard decisions had to be made at times regarding animals we had grown to love, but were simply not able to have a decent quality of life afterwards, or to be safely adopted out. I learned a lot during my time with that rescue - and the main thing was that it's NOT all happy endings and feelgood moments... it can be hard work and emotionally draining actually. There is nothing vague in my statements regarding spending time and resources on animals that have little prospect of resonable quality of life after those resources have been allocated to them - nor my statements regarding allocation of same to those that CAN have a decent quality of life afterwards. Calling me dishonest and inferring that I am unethical because I chose to donate my time and energy to helping care for rescue animals - regardless whether YOU believe they should have been allowed to exist in the first place - is a bit rich. I made my choice to donate that time and energy to that rescue, just like you made the choice to do the same with the rescue you are with. I still stand by my statement that everyone in rescue is free to make the choices they do for their own reasons, and that the general public is also free to make the choice as to which rescues they will donate money or resources to. T.

And I'd be willing to be money that rescues whose choices you question probably feel the same way. And we are all free to question each other, and choose who we want to support and who we don't, yes? It's still about choices... *grin* T.

Because expecting everyone to agree to a set of guidelines when it's an entirely subjective question is absurd? I think allowing rescue dogs to have puppies is very wrong, but others (like you) would disagree on that point. Are the lives of unborn puppies worth the resources? Who knows, because that is a values question, not something rational that can be worked out with a calculator. Is it right to bag another rescue's use of resources when your own could legitimately be questioned? With regards to the bolded point.. when you're rescuing greyhounds (and possibly other working breeds), saying no to a surrender could (and very likely would) mean that dog's death. So yeah, you have the option to "just" say no. But it's not a simple issue. It comes back to (again) personal values. Having a profitable rescue would be great (I hear puppies are good sellers) but I'd rather have my morals intact Rescues and rescuers still have the choice what they take in and what they allocate resources to... your choices may be different to rescues that I've worked with in the past, but that doesn't mean that either of us are "wrong" in the choices made... I get the sense that you are having a bit of a dig at a rescue that I worked with previously - which shut down a few years ago and the owner is now retired. For the record, I'm not bagging your rescue or your choices... I'm simply stating that the public who make donations are within their rights to select who or what they choose to support based on their own values. T.

Ditto that!!! T.

Well.. no, not really? as I pointed out, some rescues take dogs from pounds so they can pick out the superficially healthy dogs (who may end up having hidden health problems anyway) but for rescues who take surrenders, you get what you get and sometimes, what you get is health issues. I had two dogs dropped off to me once with matching cases of raging kennel cough. As much as it annoyed me to have to deal with that, the only other option for the dogs was the trainer dropping them off at the vet to be put to sleep, on his way home. So you make the best of a shitty situation because that's all you can really do. Also, I feel it's worth pointing out that one person's waste of resources is not necessarily another's. Powerlegs rescues oldies and while many of us would agree that oldies definitely deserve that chance, some people would argue that rescuing old dogs is a waste of resources because they won't live as long and pounds are full of young animals. I took back a very eldely greyhound who could not be rehomed again and although it was a "waste" of my resources, I fed her and cared for her until she finally died. It was a "waste" of money but I'm not in rescue to look after the welfare of my bank account There's certainly a difference between rescuing a dog so elderly/poorly that it can barely walk and rescuing an older dog or a dog with treatable health problems but the thing is, none of us have crystal balls and even with really good vets and all the information, what seems like a sensible call can still end badly. I wholeheartedly disagree with silly shit like putting prosthetic legs on dogs (because I don't think it improves their quality of life) but most of us are just trying to get it right and don't need the added crap of people arguing over how much/little is right. You can't please all the people, all the time, especially not when the everyone has their own ideas about what is reasonable in terms of resource allocation. I think it could also be argued that pregnant bitches should be spayed, rather than allowing puppies to be born. The future desexing/vacination/microchipping of the puppies would far outweigh the cost of ending their lives in utero, so why are rescues creating more costs for themselves? Because they think it's right? Yeah.. There is still a choice made to take on any animal - be it from a pound or as a surrender. You still have the option to say no... or to allocate resources as you feel necessary to treat issues that are treatable. No-one is bagging rescues for unforseen issues arising with an animal they have taken in in good faith (well, I'm not anyways). It is also the choice of the general public to decide which rescues they wish to donate time and resources to... usually based on their own opinion of what is "right" or "wrong" with regards to how rescues allocate their funds. Not much we can do about that though... *grin* If rescue can't agree on what is "right" or "wrong" when it comes to what they do, then how are the general public supposed to work it out? T.

It's never going to be the right time for we humans having to say goodbye to our beloved companions... and that's where the doubt comes in... purely human emotion, and perfectly normal to doubt our own decision making at the time. We need to remember that hindsight is 20/20 too, and wondering "what if I'd tried xyz" will always factor in after the fact. T.

At the end of the day, rescues operate on their own agendas... they choose which animals they will take in, and how much time, effort, or money they are prepared to spend on each. If we, as the public, disagree with their decisions, then we can choose not to donate money or resources to that rescue, yes? That said, I sometimes wonder that some people in rescue get into it for reasons that aren't always in the animals' best interests. It can be a fine balancing act to get things "right" as often as possible and satisfy public opinion... some people are good at getting that balance right, and others seem to thrive on the drama and attention a "special case" garners them - regardless of the outcome for the animal in question. There are a few rescues that appear to be more consistent in their decision making processes, and take on only what they can handle well with good outcomes for the animals in their care... and we should be holding those rescues up as the great examples they are... rather than giving attention (good or bad) to those we perceive are not getting it "right". T.

Eggs carry the highest protein count of all foods... just balance the rest of the diet accordingly to avoid protein overload. T.

I agree DDD... it's never an easy decision... even when it's the only decision you have to make for your loyal friend and companion of many years. And it's even worse when it's your heart dog... 'cos it never stops being as raw as the day they had to leave you - I still weep copious tears and miss my beloved Woosie so much, and she left me in 2004... crying now just typing her name... *sob* I'm all for treatments for animals who have a prospect of a decent quality of life aferwards... but not as fussed on prolonging questionable quality of life because we humans can't bring ourselves to "kill" our pets. It is the most noble deed you can do for them when the time comes IMHO... putting them above our own hurt and feelings of loss... T.

Wow!!! Stunning photos as always huga... and gorgeous subjects to boot! T.

The RSPCA (at least in NSW) are very much "do as we say, not as we do" when it comes to managing kennels... has anyone seen their facilities in Yagoona? Funny how they actively avoid letting people visit their kennel blocks... there is a reason... Let's face it, when you feed animals, they poop and pee... and keeping on top of that is what we staff that work in kennels are fully aware of. It's so frustrating to bust a gut meticulously cleaning a kennel or run only to have the animal go back in and lay a huge steaming one on your nice clean floor... grrr! Even more fun when you have the ones who think running through it and spreading it everywhere is the order of the day... *sigh*... you aren't only washing the kennel, but the animal too... daily! Keeping on top of cleaning, exercising, checking body condition, hand feeding Pookie their special diet from their own special bowl, or making sure medications are given at their designated times of the day are things kennel staff have to be on top of every minute of their working day... no mean feat when it's peak boarding season and the kennels are full to capacity. Good boarding facilities make sure they have enough staff to cover the workload at all times... and that is what makes all the difference. Note: there will be times when "Pookie" will have to share space with his/her own excrement... but we do our very best to make that time as short as possible, OK? T.

Rescue does seem to attract a large number of "if it has a pulse, it must be saved" types... and I sometimes wonder whether some people are in the industry for the animals, or for their own personal "feelgoods". I've had to make the heart-rending decision for a few rescue animals who were physically healthy, but mentally broken enough to not be adoptable safely. I've held my share of rescue animals while they were given their wings. It's not fair to keep an animal indefinitely who's every day is a torment of emotional issues. It is not fair to keep such an animal indefinitely in the vain hope that some member of the public wants to adopt an animal with severe issues... what normal person really wants to devote years of their lives trying to manage such issues in a pet? Spending massive amounts of money on diseases and ailments that leave an animal compromised in some way, and needing management for the rest of their lives is also a bugbear of mine. Some "rescuers" seem to thrive on the drama and attention they receive when they put out their pleas for funding help to deal with such issues... and I sometimes wonder about who/what exactly these people are doing it all for... because I don't believe it's for the animals' sake. It is hard to know exactly when to make that particular call with any animal in your care... and even moreso when it's a beloved family member you have shared your life with for years. Westiemum, you made the right choice at the right time for Mac... no 2 bones about it, OK? And you will get it right for Sarebear when her time comes too... *hugs* T.

Sounds pretty good to me... shouldn't need extra calcium input. You don't want to grow him too fast either. Check out http://www.greatdanerescue.com.au/Docs/diet_section.pdf - written by one of our very own DOLers... it will explain a bit about growning giant/large breeds, and where caution needs to be exercised. T.

One of my co-workers is doing a course in dog training... maybe I will offer her Harper as a case study... lol! Dog knows, Harper needs to get a fair bit of training still, and some extra socialisation with new people and other dogs (in a controlled environment of course). Trouble will be 11 in February, and I just realised yesterday that she is starting to look her age... still doesn't act it though. T.